50
D
F
done so was Mr. Hyniman who had, however, been absent from the duties of his office since 3 o'clock P.M. on the 3rd Instant when taken ill he had to go home, since which he has not returned to the Treasury, consequently I have no hesitation in disbelieving Mr. Panicefote's assertions being far from ... they relate to "threats need" relying "relying however" he evidently did upon the imperfect statement of his Clerk: But I have very much to regret your letter of the 16th Instant you positively assert that "There is no reason to doubt" you do "doubt, Mr. Panicefote's statement that "the money was offered at the Treasury on the 3rd Instant" when there is not a single sentence, not a single word communication that can bear such an interpretation. Indeed let me draw your attention to the second paragraph of my letter and will it not convey inferentially to your mind the admission that a Clerk did call to pay Mr. Panicefote's Rate, but that it may be that he mismiiderstood what might in substance have been said to him, i.e., that the gathering of the Tax of August had passed unpaid on the 31st, from the Treasury to the Court of Summary Jurisdiction to whom an application had been made for a warrant to recover the amount overdue.
As to my statement that I had no doubt that the occupant of Lot No. 145 "was and is included in the List submitted on the 3rd Instant to the Court" I conceived in that case I had no doubt in my mind upon the matter that in the absence of Mr. Hynoman, my only reliable authority in such cases, it would not have been mise...
50
D
F
done so was Mr. Hyniman who had
however been absent from the duties of his office since 3 o'clock P. M. on the
pet Instint when taken ill he had to
до
home, since which he has not returned
to the Treasury, consequently I have no hesitation in disbelieving Mr Panicefote's
cssertions
being
〃
far
no
they relate to "threats
need " relying
" relying however
его
he
evidently
did upon the imperfect statement of his
Clerk: But I have
your
very
much to regret
letter of the 16th Instant
you
positively assert that "There
that in
should so
" is no reason to doubt,
по
you
do
" doubt, Mr Panicefote's statement that
〃
"
"the money was
offered at the Treasury-
on the 3rd Instant" when there is
not a single sentence not a
m
my
such an
draw
single word communication that can bear
interpretation. Indeed let me
67
attention to the second paragraph
your of my letter and will it not
convey inferentially
3.
'
inferentially to
your
mind the admission that a Clerk did call to
pay Mr Panicefote's Rate, but that it
may
be that he mismiiderstood what might in substance have been said to him, ie. that the gathering of the Tax * of August had passed
inpaid on the 31st,
from the Treasury to the bourt of Summary Jurisdiction to whom an application had been made for a warrant to recover the
amount overdue._
As to
my
statement that I had no
doubt that the occupant of Lot h: 145
"was and is included in the List
submitted
on
the pet Instant to the
although
" Court "I conceived in that case I had
no doubt in my mind upon the matter that in the absence of Mr
Aynoman, my only reliable authority
in such cases, it would not have been
mise
H
P
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.